Yep, we may get a tiny thank-you (read: commission) when you buy through
links on Gadgetspotr — not enough for a yacht, but enough to keep the lights (and
servers) on.
Learn more
90
Highlights
40
Differences
5
Reactions
0
Likes
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger
vs
Anker 735 Nano 2:
90 Highlights & 40 Differences —
So, Which Charger Actually Works Better
Choose UGREEN for versatile charging across devices or Anker for orderly cable handling and stable output.
We ran the full gadget test: UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger vs Anker 735 Nano 2 — from usb-c ports, wireless charging power, cable length & interchangeable plugs to design smarts, here’s how they compare.
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger vs Anker 735 Nano 2: A Comprehensive Comparison
When it comes to fast charging solutions that combine portability with power, the UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger and the Anker 735 Nano 2 stand out as top contenders. Both chargers leverage advanced GaN fast charging technology to offer high-performance, energy-efficient powering capable of meeting the demands of smartphones, tablets, and laptops alike. Each unit supports up to 65W maximum output power, powering multiple devices simultaneously via two USB-C and one USB-A port. Despite these similarities, they diverge in aspects like thermal management, power distribution methods, and plug design, which can be decisive depending on user needs.
The UGREEN Nexode impresses as a compact, travel-friendly charger built for flexibility and convenience. Its key highlight is the interchangeable plug system, enabling seamless adaptation to different regional power outlets; an invaluable feature for international travelers. Weighing just 0.286 pounds and classified under a compact travel size, it slips effortlessly into any bag or pocket.
Durability and Energy Efficiency Champion: Anker 735 Nano 2
On the other hand, the Anker 735 Nano 2 shines with its emphasis on stability, longevity, and eco-conscious operation. Its standout thermal control is demonstrated by a high heat management efficiency and an elevated thermal throttling threshold of 176°F, which allows for more stable, prolonged charging sessions with less risk of overheating. Constructed partly with heat-resistant polycarbonate, the charger is designed for enhanced durability and drop resistance.
Unlike the dynamic distribution in UGREEN, the Anker relies on a fixed power distribution system, which can offer reliable, consistent charging for multiple devices. The charger also introduces user-friendly touches such as external cable management that helps keep charging setups neat and tangle-free.
On the sustainability front, it supports energy-saving features, including eco mode, resulting in low power wastage. The Anker boasts a longer rated lifespan and a higher MTBF (mean time between failures), promising lasting reliability. While it lacks plug interchangeability, its universal compatibility ensures wide-ranging device application.
Warranted for 1.5 years and backed by diverse support channels like email, chat, and online portals, the Anker 735 Nano 2 is a dependable companion for users prioritizing stable thermal performance and eco-conscious charging.
Quick Take
The UGREEN Nexode 65W charger is a travel-savvy all-rounder that excels at powering multiple devices with its smart dynamic power distribution and versatile plug options. Meanwhile, the Anker 735 Nano 2 offers superior heat management and long-lasting durability, complemented by thoughtful cable management and energy-saving capabilities that focus on sustainability and user convenience.
Bottom Line
Ultimately, your choice boils down to your personal priorities. If you frequently travel internationally or juggle charging several devices with varying power needs, the UGREEN Nexode 65W stands out for its plug versatility and dynamic charging. If, however, you want a charger with top-tier thermal stability, longer lifespan, and integrated energy-saving features that contribute to eco-friendly daily use, the Anker 735 Nano 2 is the smarter pick. Both share a competitive price point of around $39.99 at UGREEN, making this decision a balance between travel convenience and advanced thermal performance.
Verdict
Winner: UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger - Offers dynamic power allocation with interchangeable plugs, ideal for travelers and multi-device users.
Runner-up: Anker 735 Nano 2 - Excels in thermal management, durability, and energy efficiency, great for eco-conscious users seeking longevity and stability.
Side by side. The numbers. The features. No drama.
We dove deep into UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger vs Anker 735 Nano 2 — every major spec, performance test, and design callout is here to help you pick the right charger.
Both chargers were released in the year 2022, so they are contemporaries with similar technology vintages.
The year the charger model was first released to market.
In the battle of Release Year,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Release Year on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
The Product Name for UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger is 'UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger', while for Anker 735 Nano 2 it is 'Anker 735'. This clearly differentiates the two products by their designated names.
Official product name used to identify the charger model.
In the battle of Product Name,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
4 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Product Name on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
76
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger
0Votes
Fast Charging, GaN
85
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
GaN
vs
Charging Technology
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger uses Fast Charging and GaN technology, whereas Anker 735 Nano 2 employs only GaN technology. This means UGREEN offers an additional fast charging feature.
Indicates the core technology used to deliver power efficiently.
In the battle of Charging Technology,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
worse than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
lower
9 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Charging Technology on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger and Anker 735 Nano 2 are both designed for Indoor usage environments, indicating similar intended user settings.
Specifies the environments where the charger is designed to operate.
In the battle of Usage Environment,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Usage Environment on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Both UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger and Anker 735 Nano 2 are targeted at Beginner user levels, making them equally suitable for those new to fast chargers.
Describes the technical experience level required to use the charger effectively.
In the battle of User Level,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
User Level on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
The installation type is plug-in, allowing easy setup by simply connecting to a power outlet without additional mounting.
Anker 735 Nano 2
Installation type is plug-in, indicating easy setup by directly connecting to a power outlet without additional wiring or mounting requirements.
Describes how the charger is installed or connected.
In the battle of Installation Type,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Installation Type on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
The charger is intended for use in home, office, and travel environments, showing versatility across common charging scenarios.
Describes where and how the charger is primarily intended to be used.
In the battle of Intended Use,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Intended Use on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Power Source
What is the power source?
86
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger
0Votes
AC Outlet
85
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
AC Outlet
Anker 735 Nano 2
Power is sourced directly from an AC outlet, the standard electrical supply found in homes and offices, ensuring broad compatibility and ease of use.
Defines where the charger draws its power from.
In the battle of Power Source,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Power Source on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
This charger holds several important certifications—including UL, CE, FCC, and RoHS—that demonstrate compliance with safety, electromagnetic compatibility, and environmental standards.
Lists official safety, quality, and compliance certifications held by the charger.
In the battle of Certifications,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Certifications on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Defines the primary charger category based on form and usage.
In the battle of Charger Type,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Charger Type on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Indicates the types of devices the charger can power.
In the battle of Device Compatibility,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
worse than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
lower
9 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Device Compatibility on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Compatibility Notes
Are compatibility notes clearly provided?
No
0Votes
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger
No
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Indicates whether additional compatibility limitations or requirements are clearly disclosed.
In the battle of Compatibility Notes,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
same as
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Compatibility Notes on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Indicates how the charger is physically positioned during use.
In the battle of Mounting Style,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
11 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Mounting Style on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Regulatory Region
Which regulatory regions does it support?
46
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger
0Votes
US
75
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Global
Indicates the regions where the charger meets regulatory standards.
In the battle of Regulatory Region,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
worse than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
lower
29 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Regulatory Region on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Describes the overall physical form and size profile of the charger.
In the battle of Product Form Factor,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Product Form Factor on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger has an output voltage of 5 volts, while Anker 735 Nano 2 has a higher voltage output of 20 volts. Thus, Anker offers higher voltage suitable for a wider range of devices.
The voltage supplied to connected devices during charging.
In the battle of Output Voltage,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
worse than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
lower
15.0 Volt
measurement.
Based on community votes for Output Voltage,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ earned
0 votes,
less than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉,
which got 1 votes.
Output voltage here really stands out to me with the Anker 735 Nano 2 having a way higher voltage than UGREEN and that could be important for some devices.
The Input Current for UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger is 2.3 amps compared to 1.8 amps for Anker 735 Nano 2, indicating UGREEN draws slightly more current during operation.
The amount of current drawn from the power source during operation.
In the battle of Input Current,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
worse than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
0.5 A
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Input Current on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
The Maximum Output Power for both UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger and Anker 735 Nano 2 is 65 watts, implying they can deliver the same peak charging power.
The highest total power the charger can deliver to connected devices.
In the battle of Maximum Output Power,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
same as
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
equal
65.00 Watt
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Maximum Output Power on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Both UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger and Anker 735 Nano 2 include Short Circuit Protection, enhancing safety during use.
Automatically shuts down power if a short circuit is detected.
In the battle of Short Circuit Protection,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
same as
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Short Circuit Protection on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Peak Power Handling is equal at 65 watts for both UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger and Anker 735 Nano 2, indicating similar power peak capabilities.
The maximum short-term power the charger can safely handle.
In the battle of Peak Power Handling,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
same as
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
equal
65.00 Watt
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Peak Power Handling on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Standby Power Consumption
How much power is used on standby?
0.3
Watt
0Votes
0.3
Watt
0Votes
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger
The charger consumes only 0.3 Watt in standby mode, indicating good energy efficiency when not actively charging.
Anker 735 Nano 2
The standby power consumption is very low at 0.3 Watts, which helps reduce energy waste when the charger is plugged in but not actively charging a device.
Power consumed when the charger is plugged in but not actively charging.
In the battle of Standby Power Consumption,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
same as
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
equal
0.30 Watt
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Standby Power Consumption on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Voltage regulation quality is excellent, ensuring stable output voltage for device safety and optimal charging.
Anker 735 Nano 2
Voltage regulation quality is excellent, ensuring stable voltage output to prevent damage to devices and maintain efficient charging.
Indicates how well output voltage remains stable under varying load conditions.
In the battle of Voltage Regulation,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Voltage Regulation on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Minimum Output Power
What is the minimum output power?
15
Watt
0Votes
5
Watt
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
The minimum output power is 5 Watts, suitable for reliably charging smaller devices or initiating charging processes with compatible equipment.
The lowest stable power output supported by the charger.
In the battle of Minimum Output Power,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
worse than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
10.0 Watt
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Minimum Output Power on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Input Voltage
What input voltage does it support?
100
Volt
0Votes
100
Volt
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Input voltage rating of 100 Volts corresponds to the voltage level the charger can safely accept from the power source.
The voltage range required from the power source to operate safely.
In the battle of Input Voltage,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
same as
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
equal
100.00 Volt
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Input Voltage on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Input Frequency
What input frequency is supported?
50
Hz
0Votes
50
Hz
0Votes
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger
Input frequency is 50 Hz, compatible with the frequency of power grids in many global regions.
The electrical frequency range the charger can accept.
In the battle of Input Frequency,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
same as
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
equal
50.00 Hz
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Input Frequency on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Output Current
What is the output current?
1.5
A
0Votes
3.25
A
0Votes
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger
Output current is 1.5 A, supporting efficient charging while ensuring device safety.
The maximum current delivered to devices for charging.
In the battle of Output Current,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
worse than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
lower
1.8 A
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Output Current on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Power Factor
What is the power factor?
96
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger
0Votes
High
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
High
Anker 735 Nano 2
The power factor is high, indicating efficient use of electrical power, reducing wasted energy and improving charger performance.
Indicates how efficiently electrical power is drawn from the power source.
In the battle of Power Factor,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Power Factor on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Power Efficiency
How efficient is the charger?
96
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger
0Votes
High
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
High
Indicates how effectively input power is converted into usable output power.
In the battle of Power Efficiency,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Power Efficiency on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Indicates how consistently current is controlled during charging.
In the battle of Current Regulation,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
21 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Current Regulation on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Measures output stability as load increases or decreases.
In the battle of Load Regulation,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
26 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Load Regulation on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Ripple & Noise
How much ripple and noise is present?
96
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger
0Votes
Low
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Low
Indicates the level of electrical noise present in the output.
In the battle of Ripple & Noise,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Ripple & Noise on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Indicates the strength of protection against voltage spikes.
In the battle of Surge Protection Rating,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Surge Protection Rating on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Overcurrent Protection
Is overcurrent protection included?
Yes
0Votes
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Prevents damage by limiting excessive current flow.
In the battle of Overcurrent Protection,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
same as
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Overcurrent Protection on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Overvoltage Protection
Does it prevent overvoltage?
Yes
0Votes
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Protects devices from excessive voltage output.
In the battle of Overvoltage Protection,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
same as
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Overvoltage Protection on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Maximum charging speed is 65 Watts, enabling rapid charging for compatible high-power devices such as laptops and tablets.
The highest charging power delivered to a single device.
In the battle of Maximum Charging Speed,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
same as
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
equal
65.00 Watt
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Maximum Charging Speed on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger uses Dynamic Power Distribution, while Anker 735 Nano 2 employs a Fixed method. Dynamic distribution on UGREEN may provide more flexible power allocation.
Describes how power is allocated across multiple ports.
In the battle of Power Distribution Method,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
71 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Power Distribution Method on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Charging Consistency is 'Consistent' for both UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger and Anker 735 Nano 2, suggesting reliable power delivery in both chargers.
Indicates how evenly charging speed is maintained throughout a session.
In the battle of Charging Consistency,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Charging Consistency on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger supports simultaneous charging of 3 devices, whereas Anker 735 Nano 2 indicates 'Yes' without specifying a number. This likely means UGREEN explicitly supports multi-device charging, possibly with more clarity.
The maximum number of devices that can be charged at the same time.
In the battle of Simultaneous Device Charging,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
66 score
measurement.
Based on community votes for Simultaneous Device Charging,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ earned
0 votes,
less than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉,
which got 1 votes.
I kinda like how the Anker supports simultaneous charging more explicitly but UGREEN lists a fixed number which might be more reliable for multi-device use.
Heat Management Efficiency is rated 'Medium' on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger but 'High' on Anker 735 Nano 2, meaning Anker manages heat more effectively.
Measures how effectively heat is managed during charging.
In the battle of Heat Management Efficiency,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
worse than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
lower
49 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Heat Management Efficiency on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Idle Charging Behavior is 'Standby' for both UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger and Anker 735 Nano 2, meaning both maintain low power consumption when not actively charging.
Describes behavior when a device is fully charged but still connected.
In the battle of Idle Charging Behavior,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Idle Charging Behavior on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Charging Stability
How stable is the charging performance?
46
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger
0Votes
Stable
45
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Stable
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger
Charging stability is stable, minimizing fluctuations during the charging process to prolong battery life.
Anker 735 Nano 2
The charger provides stable charging stability, ensuring consistent and reliable power flow to connected devices. Stable charging is crucial for prolonging device battery life and preventing unexpected power interruptions.
Reflects how consistent charging output remains over time.
In the battle of Charging Stability,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Charging Stability on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Throttling behavior is gradual, meaning the charger reduces power output progressively under thermal or system stress, protecting components without abrupt interruptions.
Describes how charging speed is reduced when limits are reached.
In the battle of Throttling Behavior,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Throttling Behavior on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Classifies overall charging speed based on supported power and protocols.
In the battle of Charging Speed,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Charging Speed on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Intelligent Power Allocation
Does it allocate power intelligently?
Yes
0Votes
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Automatically adjusts power delivery based on connected devices.
In the battle of Intelligent Power Allocation,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
same as
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Intelligent Power Allocation on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
10
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Fast depending on device
Estimated time required to fully charge a typical device.
In the battle of Full Charge Time Estimate,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
lower
71 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Full Charge Time Estimate on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Adaptive Charging
Does it support adaptive charging?
Yes
0Votes
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Adjusts charging patterns based on device needs and conditions.
In the battle of Adaptive Charging,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
same as
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Adaptive Charging on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Device Detection Accuracy
How accurate is device detection?
96
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger
0Votes
High
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
High
Accuracy in identifying connected devices and their power needs.
In the battle of Device Detection Accuracy,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Device Detection Accuracy on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Startup Charging Delay
Is there a delay before charging starts?
No
0Votes
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger
No
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Time taken before charging begins after a device is connected.
In the battle of Startup Charging Delay,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
same as
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Startup Charging Delay on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger features Interchangeable Plugs, unlike Anker 735 Nano 2 which does not, offering more adaptability for different power outlets.
Supports interchangeable plug heads for different regions.
In the battle of Interchangeable Plugs,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
40 score
measurement.
Based on community votes for Interchangeable Plugs,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ earned
1 votes,
more than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉,
which got 0 votes.
Both UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger and Anker 735 Nano 2 have 2 USB-C ports, supporting modern connectivity standards.
Number of USB-C output ports for modern devices.
In the battle of USB-C Ports,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
USB-C Ports on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Maximum power delivered during wireless charging.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Wireless Charging Power on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Length of the included charging cable.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cable Length on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Each charger has 1 USB-A port, making them versatile for various cable types.
Number of traditional USB-A output ports.
In the battle of USB-A Ports,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
USB-A Ports on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Wireless Charging
Does it support wireless charging?
No
0Votes
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger
No
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Indicates whether the charger supports wireless charging.
In the battle of Wireless Charging,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
same as
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Wireless Charging on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Connector Type,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Connector Type on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Detachable Cable
Is the cable detachable?
No
0Votes
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Indicates whether the charging cable can be detached.
In the battle of Detachable Cable,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
worse than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Detachable Cable on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Pass-Through Charging
Does it support pass-through charging?
No
0Votes
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger
No
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Allows the charger to power devices while itself being powered.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Pass-Through Charging on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Port Placement
Where are the ports located?
56
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger
0Votes
Front
56
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Front
Location of charging ports on the charger body.
In the battle of Port Placement,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
same as
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Port Placement on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Port Labeling
Are the ports labeled?
Yes
0Votes
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Indicates whether ports are clearly labeled for identification.
In the battle of Port Labeling,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
same as
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Port Labeling on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Port Durability
How durable are the ports?
96
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger
0Votes
High
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
High
Expected resistance of ports to wear from repeated use.
In the battle of Port Durability,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Port Durability on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Connector Durability
How durable are the connectors?
96
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger
0Votes
High
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
High
Durability of the connector interface itself.
In the battle of Connector Durability,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Connector Durability on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Magnetic Alignment
Does it support magnetic alignment?
No
0Votes
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger
No
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Supports magnetic alignment for easier device placement.
In the battle of Magnetic Alignment,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
same as
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Magnetic Alignment on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Daisy-Chain
Can it be daisy-chained?
No
0Votes
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger
No
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Allows multiple chargers or devices to be linked together.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Daisy-Chain on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Port Power Priority
How is port power priority handled?
96
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger
0Votes
Auto
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Auto
Determines how power priority is assigned among ports.
In the battle of Port Power Priority,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Port Power Priority on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Total Ports
How many total ports does the charger have?
26
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger
0Votes
3
25
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
3
Total number of output ports available for charging devices.
In the battle of Total Ports,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Total Ports on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Width is very similar with UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger at 2.59 inches and Anker 735 Nano 2 at 2.6 inches, indicating comparable footprint width.
The horizontal measurement of the charger body from side to side.
In the battle of Width,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
equal
2.59 inch
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Width on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger has a height of 1.22 inches, shorter than Anker 735 Nano 2's 1.8 inches, implying UGREEN is more compact vertically.
The vertical measurement of the charger from bottom to top.
In the battle of Height,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
lower
0.6 inch
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Height on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger weighs 0.286 lbs, making it slightly lighter than Anker 735 Nano 2 which weighs 0.31 lbs, favoring UGREEN for lightweight needs.
Total weight of the charger including built-in components.
In the battle of Weight,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
equal
0.29 lbs
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Weight on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Thickness of the charging cable, affecting durability and flexibility.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cable Thickness on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Both chargers are classified as Compact in Travel Size Classification, suitable for portability during travel.
Overall size category based on dimensions and portability.
In the battle of Travel Size Classification,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Travel Size Classification on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Plug Profile Depth
How far does the plug stick out?
1.28
inch
0Votes
3.5
inch
0Votes
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger
The plug profile depth is 1.28 inch (approximately 3.25 cm), contributing to a compact charger size suitable for travel and tight spaces.
Anker 735 Nano 2
Plug profile depth is 3.5 inches (8.9 centimeters), which impacts how much the charger extends from the wall outlet.
Depth of the plug profile when inserted into an outlet.
In the battle of Plug Profile Depth,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
lower
2.2 inch
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Plug Profile Depth on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Depth
What is the depth of the charger?
1.57
inch
0Votes
1.15
inch
0Votes
The front-to-back measurement of the charger body.
In the battle of Depth,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
worse than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
0.4 inch
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Depth on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Both chargers offer 3 feet of Drop Resistance, indicating equal protection against drops.
Maximum drop height the charger can withstand without damage.
In the battle of Drop Resistance,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
same as
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
equal
3.00 ft
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Drop Resistance on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger is made of Plastic, while Anker 735 Nano 2 uses Plastic and Polycarbonate, indicating a potentially more durable build for Anker.
Primary material used for the outer charger casing.
In the battle of Housing Material,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
worse than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
lower
9 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Housing Material on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Heat-Resistant Materials are not specified for UGREEN but are present in Anker 735 Nano 2, suggesting better heat material use in Anker.
Uses materials designed to withstand high temperatures safely.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Heat-Resistant Materials on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Scratch Resistance is High on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger but Medium on Anker 735 Nano 2, favoring UGREEN for surface durability.
Resistance of the surface to scratches and abrasions.
In the battle of Scratch Resistance,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
41 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Scratch Resistance on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Material Sustainability Level is High on UGREEN and Medium on Anker, showing UGREEN may be more environmentally conscious in material sourcing.
Use of sustainable or environmentally friendly materials.
In the battle of Material Sustainability Level,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
51 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Material Sustainability Level on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Fire-Retardant Rating
What is the fire-retardant rating?
86
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger
0Votes
V-0
85
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
V-0
Anker 735 Nano 2
Fire-retardant rating is V-0, the highest UL 94 standard, indicating materials used resist burning and self-extinguish quickly if ignited, enhancing user safety.
Fire safety rating of the charger materials.
In the battle of Fire-Retardant Rating,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Fire-Retardant Rating on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Surface Finish
What is the surface finish?
26
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger
0Votes
Matte
25
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Matte
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger
The surface finish is matte, which is often preferred for reducing fingerprints and glare.
External surface finish affecting grip and aesthetics.
In the battle of Surface Finish,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Surface Finish on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Plug Material,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
worse than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
lower
24 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Plug Material on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Indicates whether charging ports are reinforced for durability.
In the battle of Port Reinforcement,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Port Reinforcement on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Build Rigidity
How rigid is the charger build?
96
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger
0Votes
Solid
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Solid
Overall structural stiffness of the charger body.
In the battle of Build Rigidity,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Build Rigidity on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Moisture Resistance,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
46 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Moisture Resistance on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Fire Protection is present in both UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger and Anker 735 Nano 2, reducing fire risk during use.
Built-in measures to reduce fire risk during electrical faults.
In the battle of Fire Protection,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
same as
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Fire Protection on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Neither UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger nor Anker 735 Nano 2 includes a Child Safety Shutter, which could be a consideration for families.
Prevents accidental insertion of objects into live ports.
In the battle of Child Safety Shutter,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
same as
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Child Safety Shutter on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Both chargers have a Multi-Layer Safety Redundancy Level, enhancing user safety with multiple protection layers.
Indicates the number of safety systems working together.
In the battle of Safety Redundancy Level,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Safety Redundancy Level on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Protection Response Time is Fast for UGREEN but Instant for Anker 735 Nano 2, meaning Anker reacts slightly quicker to protect devices.
Time taken for protection systems to activate during a fault.
In the battle of Protection Response Time,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
worse than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
14 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Protection Response Time on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Both chargers have Thermal Fail-Safe Mode to prevent overheating issues, improving reliability and safety.
Emergency mode that safely disables charging during extreme heat.
In the battle of Thermal Fail-Safe Mode,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
same as
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Thermal Fail-Safe Mode on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Overheat Protection
Does it have overheat protection?
Yes
0Votes
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Automatically reduces or shuts off power when excessive heat is detected.
In the battle of Overheat Protection,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
same as
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Overheat Protection on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Temperature Monitoring
Is temperature actively monitored?
Yes
0Votes
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Continuously monitors internal temperature during operation.
In the battle of Temperature Monitoring,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
same as
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Temperature Monitoring on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Electrical Isolation
Is electrical isolation implemented?
Yes
0Votes
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Separates high-voltage and low-voltage components for safety.
In the battle of Electrical Isolation,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
same as
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Electrical Isolation on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Grounding
Does it support grounding?
No
0Votes
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger
No
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Supports grounding to reduce shock and electrical interference.
In the battle of Grounding,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
same as
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Grounding on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Anti-Spark Protection
Does it have anti-spark protection?
No
0Votes
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Reduces sparking when plugging or unplugging devices.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Anti-Spark Protection on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
EMI Protection
Is EMI protection included?
Yes
0Votes
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Protects against electromagnetic interference affecting nearby electronics.
In the battle of EMI Protection,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
same as
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
EMI Protection on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
ESD Protection
Is ESD protection supported?
Yes
0Votes
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Shields the charger from electrostatic discharge damage.
In the battle of ESD Protection,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
same as
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
ESD Protection on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Auto Shut-Off
Does it shut off automatically?
No
0Votes
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Automatically cuts power when unsafe conditions are detected.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Auto Shut-Off on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Fault Detection
Can it detect electrical faults?
Yes
0Votes
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Detects abnormal electrical conditions during operation.
In the battle of Fault Detection,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
same as
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Fault Detection on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Overall strength of safety certifications achieved.
In the battle of Safety Certification Level,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Safety Certification Level on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Specifies the wireless charging standard supported.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Wireless Charging Standard on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Laptop Charging is supported by both UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger and Anker 735 Nano 2, broadening their device usability.
Indicates whether the charger can power laptops.
In the battle of Laptop Charging,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
same as
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Laptop Charging on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Both chargers support Tablet Charging, catering to a range of device types beyond smartphones.
Indicates compatibility with tablets and similar devices.
In the battle of Tablet Charging,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
same as
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Tablet Charging on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Both chargers support Backward Compatibility, ensuring they work with older device models.
Maintains compatibility with older charging standards and devices.
In the battle of Backward Compatibility,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
same as
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Backward Compatibility on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger offers Wide Cross-Brand Compatibility, while Anker 735 Nano 2 claims Universal compatibility, suggesting Anker may support more brands.
Level of compatibility across different device brands.
In the battle of Cross-Brand Compatibility,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
worse than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
lower
29 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cross-Brand Compatibility on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
USB Power Delivery
Does it support USB Power Delivery?
Yes
0Votes
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Indicates support for the USB Power Delivery standard for fast and flexible charging.
In the battle of USB Power Delivery,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
same as
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
USB Power Delivery on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Quick Charge
Does it support Quick Charge?
Yes
0Votes
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Indicates compatibility with Qualcomm Quick Charge technology.
In the battle of Quick Charge,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
same as
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Quick Charge on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
PPS
Does it support PPS?
Yes
0Votes
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Supports Programmable Power Supply for efficient fast charging.
In the battle of PPS,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
same as
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
PPS on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Apple Charging
Is it compatible with Apple devices?
Yes
0Votes
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Optimized compatibility with Apple devices and charging requirements.
In the battle of Apple Charging,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
same as
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Apple Charging on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Android Charging
Is it compatible with Android devices?
Yes
0Votes
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Ensures compatibility with Android devices and charging protocols.
In the battle of Android Charging,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
same as
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Android Charging on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Wearable Charging
Can it charge wearables?
Yes
0Votes
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Supports charging of wearables like smartwatches or earbuds.
In the battle of Wearable Charging,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
same as
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Wearable Charging on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Proprietary Protocol,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
worse than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Proprietary Protocol on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
The Thermal Throttling Threshold is 158°F for UGREEN and higher at 176°F for Anker 735 Nano 2, meaning Anker can operate safely at higher temperatures.
Temperature at which charging power is reduced to prevent overheating.
In the battle of Thermal Throttling Threshold,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
worse than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
lower
18.0 °F
measurement.
Based on community votes for Thermal Throttling Threshold,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ earned
0 votes,
less than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉,
which got 1 votes.
Both use Passive Thermal Dissipation Methods to manage heat without active cooling systems.
Method used to release heat during operation.
In the battle of Thermal Dissipation Method,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Thermal Dissipation Method on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
vs
Noise Level
Noise Level is silent (0 dB) on UGREEN but not available for Anker 735 Nano 2, so UGREEN guarantees noiseless operation.
Operational noise produced during charging.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Noise Level on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Energy Loss as Heat is Low for both chargers, indicating efficient energy usage with minimal wasted heat.
Percentage of input energy lost as heat during charging.
In the battle of Energy Loss as Heat,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Energy Loss as Heat on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Sustained Load Temperature Stability is Moderate on UGREEN but Stable on Anker 735 Nano 2, favoring Anker for consistent performance under load.
Temperature stability during prolonged high-load charging.
In the battle of Sustained Load Temperature Stability,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
worse than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
lower
49 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Sustained Load Temperature Stability on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Storage Temperature Range
What is the storage temperature range?
Who knows?
0Votes
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
76
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
-4–140°F
Anker 735 Nano 2
The charger can operate within a storage temperature range of -4–140°F (-20–60°C). This wide range facilitates safe storage in diverse environmental conditions without degradation.
Temperature range safe for storing the charger when not in use.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Storage Temperature Range on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Internal cooling is managed by a heat sink, a passive cooling component that absorbs and disperses heat generated during charging to prolong charger lifespan.
Internal structure designed to manage heat.
In the battle of Internal Cooling Design,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
worse than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
lower
9 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Internal Cooling Design on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Ambient Temperature Tolerance
How tolerant is it to ambient temperatures?
0
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger
0Votes
Medium
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
High
Anker 735 Nano 2
High ambient temperature tolerance means the charger can reliably function in warmer environments without risk of overheating or performance degradation.
Ability to perform in varying ambient temperatures.
In the battle of Ambient Temperature Tolerance,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
worse than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
lower
95 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Ambient Temperature Tolerance on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
The charger is designed to operate at altitudes up to 10,000 ft (3048 meters), which is beneficial for use in high-altitude locations without performance loss.
Maximum altitude at which the charger operates reliably.
In the battle of Altitude Operating Range,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
worse than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
lower
4 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Altitude Operating Range on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Operating Temperature Range
What is the operating temperature range?
Who knows?
0Votes
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
56
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
32–104°F
The temperature range within which the charger operates safely.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Operating Temperature Range on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Fanless Design
Is the charger fanless?
Yes
0Votes
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Indicates whether cooling is achieved without a fan.
In the battle of Fanless Design,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
same as
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Fanless Design on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Plug Orientation is Straight for both UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger and Anker 735 Nano 2, which is standard for wall chargers.
Orientation of the plug relative to the charger body.
In the battle of Plug Orientation,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Plug Orientation on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
55
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
External
vs
Cable Management
Cable Management is not applicable or unavailable for UGREEN but is External on Anker 735 Nano 2, which may help organize cables better.
How the charging cable is managed when not in use.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cable Management on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Neither charger has LED Indicators, which some users might miss for device status feedback.
Presence of LED lights to show charging or power status.
In the battle of LED Indicators,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
same as
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
LED Indicators on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Travel Friendly is 'Yes' for both chargers, making them suitable for users on the go.
Designed for easy transport and use while traveling.
In the battle of Travel Friendly,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
same as
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Travel Friendly on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Daily Use Convenience is rated High on both UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger and Anker 735 Nano 2, suggesting both are user-friendly daily chargers.
Overall convenience during everyday use.
In the battle of Daily Use Convenience,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Daily Use Convenience on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Foldable Plug
Does it have a foldable plug?
Yes
0Votes
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Anker 735 Nano 2
A foldable plug is featured, making the charger more compact and easier to transport. This design is convenient for travel, reducing the risk of damaging the plug during storage.
Indicates whether the plug can fold for easier storage and travel.
In the battle of Foldable Plug,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
same as
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Foldable Plug on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Indicator Behavior
How do the indicators behave?
Who knows?
0Votes
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
How indicator lights behave during operation.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Indicator Behavior on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
User Feedback Method
How does it provide user feedback?
Who knows?
0Votes
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Methods used to communicate status to the user.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
User Feedback Method on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
One-Hand Operation
Can it be operated with one hand?
No
0Votes
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Allows easy plugging and unplugging with one hand.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
One-Hand Operation on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Setup Complexity,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Setup Complexity on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Maintenance Requirements
Does it require maintenance?
96
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger
0Votes
None
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
None
Level of maintenance needed to keep the charger functioning well.
In the battle of Maintenance Requirements,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Maintenance Requirements on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Firmware Upgradable
Can the firmware be updated?
No
0Votes
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger
No
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Indicates whether the charger firmware can be updated.
In the battle of Firmware Upgradable,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
same as
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Firmware Upgradable on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Environmental Stress Resistance is Medium for both chargers, indicating similar durability under environmental challenges.
Ability to withstand heat, humidity, and other stresses.
In the battle of Environmental Stress Resistance,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Environmental Stress Resistance on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Both chargers have Premium Manufacturing Quality Level, which should reassure customers regarding build quality.
Overall manufacturing quality classification.
In the battle of Manufacturing Quality Level,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Manufacturing Quality Level on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Rated Lifespan is Moderate for UGREEN and Long for Anker 735 Nano 2, favoring Anker for longer product longevity.
Expected operational lifespan of the charger under normal usage conditions.
In the battle of Rated Lifespan,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
worse than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
lower
49 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Rated Lifespan on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Mean Time Between Failures is Medium on UGREEN and High on Anker 735 Nano 2, indicating greater expected reliability from Anker.
Average reliability level indicating how often failures are expected.
In the battle of Mean Time Between Failures,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
worse than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
lower
49 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Mean Time Between Failures on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
How durable is the charging cable under repeated bending?
36
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger
0Votes
Low
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
vs
Cable Flex Cycles
Cable Flex Cycles are Low for UGREEN but unavailable for Anker 735 Nano 2, so flexibility durability is clearer only for UGREEN.
Indicates how many bending cycles the charging cable can withstand before performance degradation.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cable Flex Cycles on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Long-Term Stability
How stable is long-term performance?
Who knows?
0Votes
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Stable
Anker 735 Nano 2
Long-term stability refers to the charger’s ability to maintain consistent performance over extended periods without failure or efficiency loss.
Performance consistency over extended use periods.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Long-Term Stability on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Plug Insertion Cycles
How durable is the plug connection over time?
96
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger
0Votes
High
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
High
Indicates how many plug-in and unplug cycles the charger connector is designed to withstand before wear affects performance.
In the battle of Plug Insertion Cycles,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Plug Insertion Cycles on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Port Wear Resistance
How resistant are the ports to wear?
96
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger
0Votes
High
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
High
Resistance of charging ports to wear over time.
In the battle of Port Wear Resistance,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Port Wear Resistance on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Reliability Certification
Is reliability certified?
Yes
0Votes
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Indicates whether reliability has been independently certified.
In the battle of Reliability Certification,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
same as
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Reliability Certification on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Energy Efficiency Rating is High for both UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger and Anker 735 Nano 2, indicating efficient power use.
Overall classification of how efficiently the charger converts power.
In the battle of Energy Efficiency Rating,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Energy Efficiency Rating on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Power Loss Rating is Low for both chargers, suggesting minimal wasted energy during charging.
Indicates the amount of input power lost during conversion and operation.
In the battle of Power Loss Rating,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Power Loss Rating on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Both chargers have a Medium Carbon Footprint Category, reflecting a moderate environmental impact.
Estimated environmental impact from production and use.
In the battle of Carbon Footprint Category,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Carbon Footprint Category on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Energy Saving Features are not available on UGREEN but present on Anker 735 Nano 2, enhancing Anker's environmental efficiency.
Built-in features designed to reduce energy consumption.
In the battle of Energy Saving Features,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
worse than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Energy Saving Features on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Eco Mode is not available on either charger, so energy-saving features are limited.
Reduces power consumption when full charging is not required.
In the battle of Eco Mode,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
same as
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Eco Mode on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Energy Star Compliance
Is it Energy Star compliant?
No
0Votes
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger
No
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Indicates compliance with Energy Star efficiency standards.
In the battle of Energy Star Compliance,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
same as
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Energy Star Compliance on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Standby Efficiency
How efficient is the charger in standby mode?
96
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger
0Votes
High
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
High
Indicates how efficiently the charger uses power while plugged in but not actively charging.
In the battle of Standby Efficiency,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Standby Efficiency on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Green Materials Usage
Are green materials used?
No
0Votes
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger
No
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Uses environmentally friendly or recycled materials.
In the battle of Green Materials Usage,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
same as
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Green Materials Usage on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
16
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger
0Votes
Business Hours
15
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Business Hours
vs
Customer Support Availability
Customer Support Availability is during Business Hours for both UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger and Anker 735 Nano 2, indicating similar support accessibility.
Availability of customer support services.
In the battle of Customer Support Availability,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Customer Support Availability on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Support Channels for UGREEN include Email and Phone, while Anker offers Email, Chat, and Online Portal, providing more diverse customer support options.
Ways users can contact customer support.
In the battle of Support Channels,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
worse than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
lower
17 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Support Channels on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
26
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger
0Votes
Standard Returns
25
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Standard Returns
vs
Replacement Policy
Both chargers have Standard Returns Replacement Policy, which is typical for product returns and warranties.
Defines the terms under which a defective or faulty charger can be replaced.
In the battle of Replacement Policy,
UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Replacement Policy on UGREEN Nexode 65W iPhone Charger ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Surveys
Because hot takes deserve votes.
Charging Speed
How satisfied are you with the charging speed of this chargers when powering everyday devices?
Extremely fast charging — Under 1 hour
0Votes
0Votes
Very fast charging — 1 to 2 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Decent charging speed — 2 to 4 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Slow charging — 4 to 6 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Very slow charging — Over 6 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Power Output Performance
How well does this chargers provide enough power for phones, tablets, or laptops?
Handles high-demand devices easily — 65 watts or more
0Votes
0Votes
Strong and reliable output — 45 to 64 watts
0Votes
0Votes
Good for most daily devices — 25 to 44 watts
0Votes
0Votes
Limited power capability — 10 to 24 watts
0Votes
0Votes
Very weak power delivery — Under 10 watts
0Votes
0Votes
Durability and Build Quality
How durable does this chargers feel during long-term daily use?
Feels built to last a long time — Over 5 years
0Votes
0Votes
Very solid and dependable — 3 to 5 years
0Votes
0Votes
Decently built for regular use — 2 to 3 years
0Votes
0Votes
Feels somewhat fragile — 1 to 2 years
0Votes
0Votes
Breaks down too quickly — Under 1 year
0Votes
0Votes
Portability and Size
How easy is it to carry this chargers for travel or commuting?
Ultra compact and pocketable — Under 3 ounces
0Votes
0Votes
Light and travel friendly — 3 to 5 ounces
0Votes
0Votes
Moderately easy to carry — 5 to 7 ounces
0Votes
0Votes
Somewhat bulky — 7 to 10 ounces
0Votes
0Votes
Heavy and inconvenient — Over 10 ounces
0Votes
0Votes
Heat Management
How well does this chargers control heat during extended charging sessions?
Stays cool even under heavy use — Under 90 degrees Fahrenheit
0Votes
0Votes
Gets slightly warm — 90 to 100 degrees Fahrenheit
0Votes
0Votes
Noticeably warm to the touch — 100 to 110 degrees Fahrenheit
0Votes
0Votes
Runs quite hot — 110 to 120 degrees Fahrenheit
0Votes
0Votes
Uncomfortably hot — Over 120 degrees Fahrenheit
0Votes
0Votes
Ease of Use
How easy is it to use this chargers on a daily basis?
Effortless and intuitive — No learning needed
0Votes
0Votes
Very easy to understand — Minimal effort
0Votes
0Votes
Takes a little getting used to — Some adjustment
0Votes
0Votes
Slightly confusing at times — Requires patience
0Votes
0Votes
Frustrating to use — Feels complicated
0Votes
0Votes
Setup Experience
How smooth is the initial setup experience with this chargers?
Instantly ready to use — Plug and charge
0Votes
0Votes
Quick and simple setup — Less than 1 minute
0Votes
0Votes
Setup takes some attention — A few minutes
0Votes
0Votes
Setup feels awkward — Several minutes
0Votes
0Votes
Setup feels annoying — Too many steps
0Votes
0Votes
Design and Visual Appeal
How attractive does the design of this chargers look in everyday environments?
Sleek and modern look — Feels premium
0Votes
0Votes
Clean and stylish design — Looks nice
0Votes
0Votes
Simple and acceptable — Nothing special
0Votes
0Votes
Somewhat unattractive — Feels dated
0Votes
0Votes
Cheap-looking design — Not appealing
0Votes
0Votes
Noise and Comfort
How comfortable is this chargers to use in quiet environments?
Completely silent operation — No noise at all
0Votes
0Votes
Almost silent — Barely noticeable
0Votes
0Votes
Occasionally noticeable — Slight sound
0Votes
0Votes
Clearly noticeable noise — Can be distracting
0Votes
0Votes
Annoyingly loud — Very disruptive
0Votes
0Votes
Pricing and Value
How do you feel about the price of this chargers compared to what it offers?
Supermod
Moderator
Recaptor
